<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally, talk 7 hours straight again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creativebriefing.com/finally-talk-7-hours-straight-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creativebriefing.com/finally-talk-7-hours-straight-again/</link>
	<description>for the marketer, designer, and entrepreneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rami</title>
		<link>http://creativebriefing.com/finally-talk-7-hours-straight-again/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Rami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativebriefing.com/finally-talk-7-hours-straight-again/#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Thing is with advertisements is that if you find no relevancy in it to yourself then people tend to dismiss it as &#039;ineffective&#039; form of promotion. If that&#039;s your case, then the advertisement is not for you (generally speaking). You&#039;d be surprised just how many people complain that their phone battery doesn&#039;t last and that usually just frustrates. I think the &#039;7 hour long battery time&#039; FIDO advert is not to promote the whole &#039;come and talk for 7 hours&#039; but is telling those &#039;frustrated&#039; customers that at FIDO, you can get a phone that LETS you talk 7 hours. This does the following: 1. Attract those users to the prospect of possibly switching to FIDO (though that&#039;s usually very difficult) and 2. Address an issue that current FIDO customers have, because after all, we know that it&#039;s cheaper and more profitable in the long run to keep our customers than to have to find new ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thing is with advertisements is that if you find no relevancy in it to yourself then people tend to dismiss it as &#8216;ineffective&#8217; form of promotion. If that&#8217;s your case, then the advertisement is not for you (generally speaking). You&#8217;d be surprised just how many people complain that their phone battery doesn&#8217;t last and that usually just frustrates. I think the &#8217;7 hour long battery time&#8217; FIDO advert is not to promote the whole &#8216;come and talk for 7 hours&#8217; but is telling those &#8216;frustrated&#8217; customers that at FIDO, you can get a phone that LETS you talk 7 hours. This does the following: 1. Attract those users to the prospect of possibly switching to FIDO (though that&#8217;s usually very difficult) and 2. Address an issue that current FIDO customers have, because after all, we know that it&#8217;s cheaper and more profitable in the long run to keep our customers than to have to find new ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verne</title>
		<link>http://creativebriefing.com/finally-talk-7-hours-straight-again/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Verne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 19:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativebriefing.com/finally-talk-7-hours-straight-again/#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Hey Garry - it&#039;s true that the relevancy of the promotion depends on who they&#039;re targeting. But somehow it seems like those who aren&#039;t aware of the technological advancements of the mobile market are also those that probably wouldn&#039;t expect to have 7 hour conversations on their cell phones. And if it is the corporate &#039;old school professionals&#039; they&#039;re targeting, as you suggested, the public mass promotion still boggles my mind.

It&#039;s funny to see how the different telco&#039;s continue to try to push for differentiation. If every service provider claims to offer the best coverage and the most up-time in the world, maybe 7-hour batteries are the only aspects left unmentioned.

...it still seems absurd to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Garry &#8211; it&#8217;s true that the relevancy of the promotion depends on who they&#8217;re targeting. But somehow it seems like those who aren&#8217;t aware of the technological advancements of the mobile market are also those that probably wouldn&#8217;t expect to have 7 hour conversations on their cell phones. And if it is the corporate &#8216;old school professionals&#8217; they&#8217;re targeting, as you suggested, the public mass promotion still boggles my mind.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny to see how the different telco&#8217;s continue to try to push for differentiation. If every service provider claims to offer the best coverage and the most up-time in the world, maybe 7-hour batteries are the only aspects left unmentioned.</p>
<p>&#8230;it still seems absurd to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garry</title>
		<link>http://creativebriefing.com/finally-talk-7-hours-straight-again/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 19:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativebriefing.com/finally-talk-7-hours-straight-again/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>I kinda had the same thought when I read that as well. 

I think I attribute that to knowing about cellphones and how we&#039;re able to unlock it and use it on other networks. Yes, I know about cell phones. That&#039;s why I have my 8890 ;P

I think It really depends who you&#039;re talking to. It would be strategy if you&#039;re talking to someone who has the need for batteries and isn&#039;t that aware of the cell phone industry. Their need combined with their lack of knowledge would make this a strategic move. A segment like this would be &#039;Old school professionals&#039;; Senior professionals that talk on the phone alot and just takes the plan the company gives them.

If they were directed towards young technophiles, wasted budget might be a better description.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda had the same thought when I read that as well. </p>
<p>I think I attribute that to knowing about cellphones and how we&#8217;re able to unlock it and use it on other networks. Yes, I know about cell phones. That&#8217;s why I have my 8890 ;P</p>
<p>I think It really depends who you&#8217;re talking to. It would be strategy if you&#8217;re talking to someone who has the need for batteries and isn&#8217;t that aware of the cell phone industry. Their need combined with their lack of knowledge would make this a strategic move. A segment like this would be &#8216;Old school professionals&#8217;; Senior professionals that talk on the phone alot and just takes the plan the company gives them.</p>
<p>If they were directed towards young technophiles, wasted budget might be a better description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

